I can only hope that these people could afford it, and that they were doing it to support us, and not to feed an addiction.” Despite this, we found that some number of players spent many thousands of dollars on rubies. In Clicker Heroes 1, we never tried to abuse players with our real-money shop, and for the most part we designed it without the shop in mind so that you never have to purchase rubies to progress. That alone is not a bad thing, until it gets abused. Despite very few of our players having complained, it felt wrong when we started doing it and it still feels wrong now.” People can make their own decisions, right? But it just doesn’t sit well with me. Everyone in the industry seems to rationalize it by shifting the blame, assuming way too much cognizance on the part of their victims. And that’s what a large part of free-to-play gaming is all about. “We really don’t like making money off players who are in denial of their addiction. Wrought with guilt over how they might be feeding into addictive personalities, the studio is course-correcting in their sequel, as explained in a long blog post by developer Fragsworth. The move comes after developers Playsaurus monitored the spending of some players in the first game, and found a select few to be spending thousands of dollar in the in-game currency called Rubies.
And it’s directly changed the course of the sequel.Ĭlicker Heroes 2 won’t be free-to-play, with the game instead adopting a traditional “pay once to unlock” model for $30. While some games revel in their “whales”, others, such as Clicker Heroes, see it as a big negative.
CLICKER HEROES 2 FREE FOR FREE
And if the game is good, why shouldn’t you? It’s a model that tries to push an experience for free while also giving paying players a worthwhile reason to throw down their dollars, but it’s a system that is ultimately open to addictive personalities. Free-to-play models are by virtue of their design, intended to entice players to spend money.
0 kommentar(er)
